We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Testers give tips for buying sports shoes
"Which running shoe is the right one for me?" Many joggers ask themselves this question, especially if they are visiting a specialty store for the first time. Because the offer is large and often presents the layperson with a difficult choice. In order to avoid health risks from unsuitable shoes, good advice when buying is particularly important. Stiftung Warentest tested 17 running shoes for men and came to an overall positive result.
Joint damage due to wrong footwear If you want to run, you need the right shoes. Health experts always recommend that injuries such as to prevent Achilles tendonitis or joint damage. Accordingly, runners should not rush to buy their shoes on their own, but should definitely seek advice from experienced staff. A current study by the Stiftung Warentest can also help with the selection. Because this has tested 17 running shoes for men (prices: 110-135 euros) and shows in its magazine “test” (issue 8/2015) which model is suitable for which foot and runner types. The overall result was positive, many shoes were rated "good", one even received the top rating "very good".
The test products were neutral and stability running shoes as well as a so-called "barefoot running shoe", whereby the groups differ mainly in the support function. It is important to take a particularly good look here, because every runner has “different requirements depending on their anatomy, their training level and the amount of running,” says the foundation. Before you buy, you should first analyze the foot position while running to see whether the heel buckles slightly or strongly.
If overpronation is better, choose stability running shoes. If it kinks inwards only slightly, orthopedic surgeons speak of a “normal pronation”, which serves as natural cushioning of the foot to cushion the impact. In this case, according to the foundation, so-called “neutral shoes” would be suitable - provided there are no other misaligned feet or orthopedic problems. On the other hand, if you buckle strongly inwards ("overpronation"), experts should better go for stability running shoes in order to offer the foot adequate support.
According to the foundation, 24 experienced runners (50% normal runners and overpronators) jogged five kilometers with each shoe for the test, which meant that the individual models ended up being “120 kilometers under their belt”. The runners then gave their detailed evaluations. In addition to the support effect, shock absorption was also assessed, which serves to protect the foot, knee and hip joints. If you were well trained, you would normally be able to cope with less cushioning than a beginner. But how pronounced these functions should actually be in the individual case can best be determined by a professional analysis before the purchase.
Four companies refuse to provide any information. The testers also examined the working conditions in the running shoe industry. They had encountered low wages and many overtime hours in the Asian factories, but “the conditions [.] Are sometimes better than in Germany,” writes the foundation. Accordingly, the German provider "Lunge" generally has only a few written specifications, e.g. for health protection or handling chemicals. Adidas, Brooks, Reebok and Salomon, on the other hand, would work "satisfactorily" for employees and the environment. There was no chance of information at Mizuno, New Balance, Nike and Saucony, the report said. Because these would have completely "refused to take a look behind the scenes". (No)