We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Complementary medicine should be compared to other specialties
The services of anthroposophic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy and phytotherapy are basically to be covered by the compulsory health care insurance (OKP). Controversial services should be specifically checked to see whether they are effective, expedient and economical. With this approach
the Federal Department of Home Affairs (EDI) would like to fulfill a constitutional mandate.
Since 2012, the compulsory health care insurance (OKP) has provisionally provided medical services in anthroposophic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, medical homeopathy and phytotherapy until 2017. This is the result of a positive referendum from 2009. The remuneration is provisional and limited, because there is no proof that the services of the four complementary medical specialties are effective, expedient and economical. After two years it became clear that this proof is not possible for the disciplines as a whole. For this reason, the EDI has proposed to equate these specialties with the other medical specialties that are paid by the OKP.
This would also apply to the principle of trust and the services would be funded by the OKP. Analogous to the other medical specialties, only individual, controversial services should be checked. For complementary medicine, it is still necessary to specify how the criteria of effectiveness, expediency and economy are applied. The FDHA and the Federal Office of Public Health (BAG) have informed the parties concerned about the planned procedure and invited them to participate in the development of the criteria and processes EDI can be adjusted via benefits in compulsory health care insurance. The Federal Council or the EDI can decide on this in their own competence. (pm)